Sunday, February 16, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
HomeBusinessSecuring supply chain resilience requires a common vocabulary and vision

Securing supply chain resilience requires a common vocabulary and vision

By Karl Buschmann and Fabian Villalobos

Under the Biden administration, progress has been made on strengthening the resilience of supply chains, but other gains are being left on the table. One reason why: The public and private sectors do not use a common vocabulary, leading to incomplete or misaligned incentives, priorities, and perspectives.

The Biden administration started sounding the alarm about America’s supply chains just weeks after taking office in 2021 with an Executive Order, followed by the launch of the Council on Supply Chain Resilience in 2023 and additional instructions in 2024. While progress has been made on strengthening the resilience of supply chains, other gains are being left on the table. One reason why: The public and private sectors do not use a common vocabulary, leading to incomplete or misaligned incentives, priorities, and perspectives. It’s time for a common vocabulary and vision. Fortunately, the inaugural Quadrennial Supply Chain Review of December 2024 lays the groundwork for an “enduring vision” for the incoming administration and for a truly common vocabulary and vision.

Let’s define terms. In its simplest form, resilience is the ability to bounce back from large-scale disruption, according to supply chain expert and MIT professor Yossi Sheffi. On that much, the private sector and government agree.

However, a disconnect occurs when it comes to the term “supply chain.” In private industry, the supply chain is about logistics, transportation, distribution, and warehousing. However, in government circles, the phrase is used to indicate what industry would refer to as a “value chain (PDF)”— the multiple steps and companies that develop and assemble products. As a result, policy conversations about reshoring, derisking, and diversification focus on firm ownership, trade policy, and the role of the government in the economy. Fortunately, transportation and logistics, which are central elements to resilience in global trade, have been addressed in the “Quadrennial Supply Chain Review.”

________________________________________

“In private industry, the supply chain is about logistics, transportation, distribution, and warehousing…in government circles, the phrase is used to indicate…the multiple steps and companies that develop and assemble products.”

________________________________________

It’s easy to see why this disconnect exists. Government works at the macro level, setting broad policy objectives. It uses the language of law, regulation, and compliance—all calibrated to the political economy. That framing trickles down to policy scholars, like academics and think tankers, who often have limited private sector experience, especially in supply chains.

Moreover, as William Alan Reinsch of the Center for Strategic and international Studies points out, senior governmental officials have incorrectly used the terms “friendshoring” and “onshoring.” That only muddles policymaking in the public sector and confuses the private sector.

spot_img
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Caribbean News

Trial-and-error separations could be replaced by quantitative and predictive molecular methods, CWRU researchers find

Case Western Reserve University CLEVELAND, USA — The process of separating useful molecules from mixtures of other substances accounts for 15% of the nation’s energy,...

Global News

EU response to US reciprocal tariff policy

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Announces “Fair and Reciprocal Plan” on Trade BRUSSELS, Belgium - The European Commission views president Trump's proposed "reciprocal” trade...