Monday, April 15, 2024
HomeBusinessEconomyThe impact of the economic war on Venezuela

The impact of the economic war on Venezuela

By Pasqualina Curcio

CARACAS, Venezuela, (Resumen) — It would be impossible to count each and every one of the ways in which the war on Venezuela declared by imperialism has harmed the country. The aggressions that we, the Venezuelans, have experienced since 1999 have been not only economic; they have been psychological as well.

There is no way to measure the consequences of the hate planted by the anti-democratic opposition, with its anti-socialist propaganda; it has extended to the point of burning people alive for being Chavistas. The outrage felt by the Venezuelan people when they see those who have sold out their native land while calling themselves Venezuelan is also immeasurable.

Having said all that, but focusing on the economic effects, we have brought up to date the calculations made in March 2019. Up to that point the economic war had caused losses that totalled $125 billion. We have calculated the corresponding damages for the year 2019 as a total of $68 billion. Thus, the total economic losses between 2016 and 2019 total of $194,000,000,000.

For Venezuelans, these 194 billion dollars is equivalent to approximately 16 months of national production. With this money, we would have been able to pay our entire foreign debt, which is 110 billion dollars, according to the Central Bank of Venezuela. Or we might have had resources sufficient to import enough food and medicine for 45 years.

The break-down of these losses is as follows: $25 billion corresponds to the money and material goods that have been looted from us, while $169 billion represents what we have been unable to produce from 2016 to 2019 as a result of the attack on Petróleos de Venezuela SA ($64 billion ) and the attack on the Venezuelan bolivar ($105 billion).

John Bolton confessed in January of 2019 that, “We froze all the assets in US territory of the state enterprise Petróleos de Venezuela SA  (Citgo). Today’s measure totals $7 billion in assets blocked at this time. Plus, over $11 billion lost in export proceeds over the next year,”

According to the ministry of foreign relations, the US and its allies have looted $25 billion from us. They disguise this as “sanctions” while others elegantly call it unilateral coercive measures, but it is nothing more than a barefaced daylight robbery and an act of piracy. About 5,400 million dollars are held in 50 banks, including the 31 tons of gold that the Bank of England has retained.  The assets and dividends of Citgo, amounting to $18 billion, are also included.

They have not only robbed us but besides, in January 2019, the US State Department announced that they would turn control of the assets, property, and goods in bank accounts belonging to the Venezuelan government over to Guaidó and making him responsible for the administration of these resources. We would like to know just how many of these dollars have been spent to protect the people of Venezuela in these times of quarantine? What is very clear to us is that 200 million of those dollars were allocated for a contract with SilverCorp whose objective was to pay mercenaries to kill Venezuelans.

With regard to the gold held by the Bank of England, we must say that the bank is required to return it to its owner immediately upon request. Now it seems, according to the English, that the owner is Guaidó, who they say is the “interim president” of Venezuela. This is such a crude robbery that no one in their right senses would believe anything so absurd. The whole world knows that it is not Guaidó who is seated in the UN General Assembly, nor the UN Human Rights Council, nor in the UN Security Council, nor the meetings of OPEC. Obviously, he is not seated in the presidential palace of Miraflores either, nor does he give orders to the National Bolivarian Armed Forces of Venezuela.

Is it Guaidó who is confronting COVID-19 in Venezuela and coordinating medical aid and protocols with the World Health Organization?

William Brownfield, ex-ambassador of the US in Venezuela, admitted, “If we are going to sanction PDVSA, this will have an impact on the entire people, on the ordinary citizen. The counter-argument is that the people suffer so much from the lack of food, safety, medicines, public health, that at this moment perhaps the greatest resolution would be to accelerate the collapse even if it produces a period of suffering of months or perhaps years.”

The attack on Petroleos de Venezuela is not being done casually; it is a premeditated and precisely aimed action. Anything that affects the petroleum industry will have repercussions not only in the industry itself but chiefly on the national economy and thus on the Venezuelan people.

The petroleum industry generates 95 percent of the hard currency that enters Venezuela as a result of exports. The decrease of these exports, whether due to a fall in the levels of petroleum production or by a decrease in petroleum prices, affects the influx of hard currency, and thus the imports of supplies, repair parts, machinery for national production. Petroleos de Venezuela is the catalyst for our domestic production.

The price of petroleum fell for four consecutive years for the first time in history, for a 65 percent decrease. In addition, the commercial and financial blockade against Petroleos de Venezuela, the difficulty or impossibility of getting supplies and repair parts, and the financial obstacles, among other reasons, have had an effect on petroleum production, which has decreased by 64 percent – going from 2.8 million barrels a day in 2013 to one million in 2019.  This has resulted in a 78 percent fall in petroleum exports, which went from $85 billion annually in 2013 to $19 billion in 2019.

Republican Virginia State Senator Richard Black admitted, referring to Venezuela, “We demonetized their currency and, through the international banking system, we made the Venezuelan currency worthless and then we go and say: ‘Look how bad this government is, your currency is worthless.’ Well, it wasn’t them; it was us who made their currency useless,” (Sputnik 09-12-2019).

The attack on the Venezuelan bolivar currency, a main weapon of the economic war, not only induced hyperinflation and with this the loss of the buying power of the working class, it also shrunk national production. As wage-earners see their buying power diminish due to rapid and disproportionate increase in prices, this also decreases the demand for goods and causes a decrease in production by sellers.

Since 2013, imperialism has caused a criminal depreciation of the Venezuelan bolivar currency by 241,657 million percent which has given rise to an increase in prices by 11,500 million percent from that year to this.

Each person can come to their conclusions about what these economic losses of $194 billion mean in terms of anguish, outrage, quality of life and lives of Venezuelans. Draw your conclusions as well about the immeasurable level of consciousness and thus of resistance shown by the Venezuelan people who have confronted the enemies of their country with high morale and with the best of strategies; the union between civilians and the military.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Caribbean News

EU-Central America: Council greenlights association agreement

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM - The EU Council adopted a decision to conclude the agreement establishing an association between the European Union and its member states,...

Global News

‘Step back from the brink,’ to avert full-scale Middle East conflict, says UN chief

NEW YORK, USA - The people of the Middle East are facing a real danger of a devastating full-scale conflict, António Guterres said on...