Dear Sir
The Massachusetts Air National Guardsman who allegedly posted highly classified documents on social media should not have received a top-secret security clearance or any security clearance based on his “background.”
He seemingly discussed violence and murder and the use of an assassination van on social media. He also apparently looked up mass shootings and government standoffs on his government computer. He was suspended from high school for discussing the use of Molotov cocktails and other weapons and making racial threats.
Why didn’t an FBI background check, which is required for high-level security clearances, expose his past and disqualify him for the security clearance?
My wife and I held top-secret security clearances back in the 1960s, and our background was thoroughly checked by the FBI. Neighbours, classmates in school, teachers and employers were interviewed before we received our clearances.
We have to tighten up the system for obtaining security clearances and disseminating classified information on a need-to-know basis. We need a federal office responsible for the oversight of the dissemination of national security documents.
When I was on a Navy staff back in the 1960s we had a top secret control officer responsible for the control of all top secret documents.
Donald Moskowitz
Londonderry NH
