By Johnny Coomansingh
In every country, there are good people. There are also ‘not-so-good people.’ The not-so-good people fall into several categories, including rebellious people, uncooperative people, hostile people, nasty people, and disobedient people. There is another category, bad people. Religious or not, the not-so-good people are just as bad as the bad people. Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) is no exception. How many generations have passed since Columbus rediscovered Trinidad? Despite the best efforts, this little country seems destined to be burdened with a whole lot of bad people.
Trinidad and Tobago endured colonialism, slavery and indentureship, emerging as an independent democratic republic with an anthem that tells the world: “Here every creed and race find an equal place.” This ‘equal place’ for all is left to be seen on the roadside of dreams. The racial mix is a hodgepodge of peoples who came from almost every part of the globe. Yet there are severe racial tensions; “… disturbances in the force” as articulated in the Star Wars Trilogy.
With the arrival of Europeans in the New World, much of the Amerindian population died because of the oppressive nature of the Spanish conquistadores. Having decimated the Amerindian population, the Spaniards and the other Europeans after them found a new source for supplementing the needed labour. In the year 1606, Dutch merchants brought 407 enslaved Africans to Trinidad, and by 1813, the slave population rose to 25, 696. Slave trading eventually ended in 1834, but as early as 1845 the British Crown began importing East Indians to the colony as indentured servants to offset the shortfall in the labour supply involved with sugar production. Today, in such a self-governed, plural society, the two major ethnic groups (Afro and Indo-Trinidadians) jostle each other for state control and power. And the racism expressed during and after the hustings is all too pellucid.
According to one researcher, the so-called equality of all people on this twin-island state is far from reality because “… electoral outcomes have reflected ethnic cleavages.” The disagreement between the races, especially on the island of Trinidad, has manifested itself not only in every election, but also in calypso lyrics and the carnival masquerade. Look at the satire expressed in the lyrics of this excerpt from the 2002 calypso From Naipaul to Shame as sung by Dr Hollis Urban Liverpool (The Mighty Chalkdust):
“Mr Chairman I thank thee for this grand Nobel Prize,
I am Vidia Naipaul from England where my heart lies,
Though I grew up on dhal, rice, baigan and roti,
I prefer baked beans, toast, jelly and English tea,
But dem East Indians in Chaguanas, Todds Road, and Couva,
Dey want me trade my English suit and put on a capra,
Dey want me trade my English loo and toilet paper,
For a latrine pit and a bottle of water.”
There is abundant evidence that a serious social problem exists. Social sustainability is difficult to achieve while such cleavages persist, but with time, there is hope that people will become more agreeable and understanding. I would be long gone, somewhere pushing up daisies. Nevertheless, I must establish that this racial equality that we all hope for in Trinidad and Tobago may take a whole junnum (10,000 years) or more to accomplish. The power of racism is probably an inbred gene riding on a chromosome in the people of Trinidad and Tobago. Could it be that the economic situation of some citizens caused racism to rise to a crescendo unmatched?
It would seem that many citizens are dissatisfied and unhappy about how things have gone over the years in the country. Trinidad and Tobago was once known as the ‘tiger in the sea of pussycats.’ The twin-island state should have settled for the name ‘Squandermania.’ For the amount of money that flowed through this outcropping of rock in the Caribbean Sea, some believe that this country could have been the ‘Dubai of the Caribbean.’ Some countries do not have the natural resources that Trinidad and Tobago has but they became economic tigers! A classic example is Singapore. What did Singapore do that we did not do?
Although Trinidad is blessed with 99 acres of asphalt, many roads, especially in the rural areas, are riddled with potholes and landslides. Bridges, barriers and road signs are in dire need of repair. Apart from the poor roads, the hostility of drivers on such narrow roads, for example, Tobago’s Windward Main Road, leaves much to be desired in terms of road safety. It could be that Tobago wants to showcase this speeding madness as a new tourism product.
Noisy vehicles with their huge booming speakers constantly pierce the silence of residential neighbourhoods; some of them with speeds of up to 100 to 120 kms/hour. Don’t even mention the booming sounds emanating from rum shops and pubs in residential areas. Historic buildings are abandoned and left to rot away. Without a vote from the citizens, some of the buildings in Sangre Grande, Toco, and Manzanilla were demolished and carted away. Because of the denuded hillsides in the Northern Range, flash flooding with the attendant mud and debris plagues Port of Spain and several adjacent cities. Let’s not talk about the incidence of litter all over Trinidad by stink and dutty people. It’s apparent that some people prefer a la basse everywhere they go.
Homeless people continue to squat, even in government forest reserves earmarked for scientific research, for example, ‘The Aripo Savannah.’ Feral dogs roam the landscape, while vagrants make their homes on the sidewalks and constantly rummage through garbage bins for food. Piles of garbage litter the landscape. Sidewalks are broken, jagged and uneven. Manholes are sometimes left uncovered. Soap and paper towels are always in short supply in the airport restrooms. Used paper cups and plates, plastic bags, bottles and other detritus litter some of the rivers and beaches. The verges of roads and highways do not escape the littering plague. It could be that tourists have a longing to experience the nastiness of a place that they visit. Trinidad and Tobago is so unlike other Caribbean destinations where tourism is the ‘bread and butter’ of the economy. There are reasons for our behaviour and lack of quality concerning tourism.
Trinidad has never had a true history of tourism due to its hydrocarbon-based economy and the development of the industrial sector after its independence in 1962. There was little growth and even stagnation in the tourism sector during 1977-1987. Moreover, there was no real need to develop a tourist industry since the exploitation of petroleum and natural gas became the economic driver. The abundance of oil and gas money engendered an anti-tourist nationalism. In fact, Dr Eric E. Williams, the first prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago did not concentrate on the development of the tourism industry for fear that the country would breed a generation of janitors and busboys.
The money obtained from the petroleum industry was short-lived. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, soft prices for petroleum on the world market ruffled the takings of the treasury. In view of the situation, the government sought a solution to bolster the flagging economy. Tourism suddenly came to the forefront, but isn’t it a bit late to start training “busboys and janitors?” How do you educate a non-tourism generation of people to a tourism-oriented one? Maybe Trinidad and Tobago should take a page out of the book of tourism in Barbados.
It’s kind of crass, but I cannot ‘put mih mouth in boli (calabash) tuh say dis:’ The busboys and janitors eventually became ‘grasscutters and road sweepers’ in the Community-Based Environmental Protection and Enhancement Programme. (CEPEP). As with everything else in Trinidad and Tobago, corruption is the cause for calamity, chaos, and confusion. CEPEP is now defunct because of corruption. Corruption is one thing. Worrisome is the word when I consider how people treat our physical environment.
After a ‘River Lime’ (hang out, party, shoot the breeze), the rivers become polluted with the entrails of animals and feathers. Some religions, after certain rites are performed, throw human hair and other foreign matter into the rivers. It is difficult not to witness young strong youth literally ravaging a garbage truck on the Beetham Highway as it slows down to enter the Port of Spain dump or what we refer to as the La Basse. Traffic jams are endless, and long lines at the banks or other service institutions (public or private) are unavoidable. It’s the same old, same old nature of things: government come, government go. This brief description brings to the fore a snippet of an image of T&T that many ignore.
Tourists, both domestic and foreign, need a modicum of security and safety when they visit any country. Entertaining tourists under such conditions is simply abhorrent. The question is: How sustainable is such a scenario? The solutions to some of the problems raised are easy to fix, while others are not so simple to arrest. It might sound as cliché, but total quality management (TQM) on the part of the political directorate is required if the country is to move towards social sustainability. Education of the masses about their role in protecting the environment; to hold and accept the environment as a personal concern, is an imperative if the tourism product is to pay dividends.
As anywhere else, Trinidad and Tobago is dealing at present with increased crime, partially generated by illicit drug peddling. Gun slinging, home invasions and banditry are everyday issues. We have more national security issues than the National Geographic! It is known worldwide that Trinidad and Tobago is a transhipment point for illegal drugs coming out of South America. There is a literal war over drug turf “behind the bridge” in Port of Spain.
As far as possible, tourists should avoid these areas. A map of Port of Spain has been sanitised to prevent tourists wandering too far from where is considered safe. However, right now, SOE or no SOE, no one is safe and nowhere is safe! This is not a good sign for any kind of venture in tourism; this is probably the most serious threat to social sustainability. Many foreign countries have already posted travel warnings about the situation in Trinidad and Tobago.
Much of what is written here is an adaptation from my chapter titled: ‘Social Sustainability of Tourism in a Culture of Sensuality, Sexual Freedom and Violence: Trinidad and Tobago,’ published in the book Island Tourism—Sustainable Perspectives (2011) edited by Professors Jack Carlsen and Richard Butler. Fifteen years after this publication, behaviours have not changed much in Trinidad and Tobago. The bad people, some of the offspring of enslaved Africans and indentured servants, are still harassing the country. The record shows that every day there is a murder or two or even three, four or five. Let’s not talk about auto theft, home invasions, banditry and praedial larceny.
The power struggle continues in place. Political parties daily elbow one another to gain control of the masses. As I said in my last article on Caribbean News Global: ‘When elephants fight it’s the grass that suffers.’ While the political infighting is ongoing, some elephants do not care who gets hurt. However, I must give voice to the fact that the ‘grass’ has much power to stop the battles of the elephants. The not-so-good people, and all the bad people, also have power. This power in these belligerent people is an evil that stalks the land. Such gun-toting people continue to bring people to their knees.
Let us take note that even in the protective services, there are officers who swore to ‘Protect and Serve’ whose activities are questionable. In June 2026, according to Allister Guevarro, commissioner of police, there were approximately 280 to 290 police officers on suspension from the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS). Seventeen of these suspended officers were formally revoked and dismissed in July 2026. The Roman poet Juvenal asked the question: “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (Who guards the guards?)
It is my sincere hope and prayer that the good people of Trinidad and Tobago will somehow override the interests and activities of the bad people. May God help us!



GEORGETOWN, Guyana, (DPI) – Prime Minister of Guyana, Brigadier (Ret’d) Mark Phillips has called on Caribbean nations to modernise their electricity infrastructure, strengthen procurement systems, and build energy networks capable of withstanding future shocks while supporting sustained economic growth.
WASHINGTON, USA – The US Coast Guard successfully completed a major interoperability exercise conducted by the crews of Legend-class national security cutter USCGC Stone (WMSL 758) and Norwegian Coast Guard Vessel Hopen, marking a significant milestone in international Arctic cooperation and operational readiness.
RIO DE JANEIRO, (PAHO) – The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and
BRIDGETOWN, Barbados – The
Macroprudential policy and productivity: Friends not foes
By Ellen Ryan
Recent years have seen rising – and well-founded – concerns over European productivity growth. As these concerns grow a suspicion emerges: is regulation to blame for the sluggish economy? This post looks at this question in the context of macroprudential regulation and argues that macroprudential policy can actually support productivity growth, by helping to prevent crises and keep credit flowing where it matters most.
Macroprudential policy is a form of regulation that focuses on the overall resilience of the financial system. The use of macroprudential policies has expanded significantly since the financial crisis of 2008. All euro area countries currently implement some form of macroprudential capital requirement for their banking system. This means that banks need to hold additional capital to make themselves resilient to shocks that affect the financial system as a whole. This is on top of what banking supervision requires of them individually. Almost all of these countries also have limits in place to curb risky mortgage lending.
Admittedly, this can come at a cost. Overly complicated or unnecessary regulation can put the brakes on banks’ ability to support the economy, which could in turn hamper productivity growth. That is why the ECB strives to improve the effectiveness of its macroprudential policies and is contributing to the simplification of Europe’s regulatory frameworks. We need as little bureaucracy as possible, and as much as necessary. Simplification of financial regulation can support capital accumulation in the real economy, thereby fostering investment, productivity and job creation over the longer term. At the same time, financing innovative firms often relies more heavily on equity and venture capital than on traditional bank lending, underscoring the importance of broader capital market development.
However, policymakers have stressed that lightening the bureaucratic burden of financial regulation should not result in the loosening of financial regulation. Simplification does not mean deregulation. But if deregulation could increase banks’ capacity to fund new innovative firms, then why not? Wouldn’t this boost European productivity growth?
Macroprudential policy has two main goals. Its primary goal is to build resilience in the financial system so that it can withstand crises. Its secondary goal is, where possible, to guard against the overconfidence and lack of caution typical of financial booms. Both macroprudential policy goals come with benefits for productivity growth. Financial crises have large and persistent adverse effects on long-term economic growth. By reducing the likelihood and severity of such crises, macroprudential policy also helps limit these long-lasting productivity losses. In addition to causing financial crises, financial booms can drive a misallocation of economic resources towards less productive sectors, particularly real estate. Macroprudential policy can lean against this misallocation.
Financial crises are bad for productivity growth…
As far as the first policy objective is concerned, one lesson from past crises cannot be overstated: financial crises are bad for productivity.
Financial crises are characterised by a sharp drop in the availability of credit. When banks cut their lending, firms tend to invest and innovate less and are more likely to go out of business. Growth in output per worker falls by 0.55 percentage points during the typical banking crisis.
Also, the innovation that drives productivity growth is a cumulative process – inventions often build on what came before. Even when economic activity recovers, it can take a long time to regain momentum after an innovation process has been cut short. Meanwhile, high unemployment can result in the deskilling of workers. The average banking crisis entails an additional long-term 1.1 percent drop in output per worker for each year it lasts.
For a typical five-year banking crisis, these short and long-run effects add up to an 8 percent total decline in output per worker. To put this number in context, since the year 2000 output per worker in the euro area has grown by an average of less than 1 percent per year. Financial crises leave productivity scars that can take many years to heal.
Where macroprudential policies build the resilience of the financial system to this type of outcome, they can help shield productivity growth from the worst effects of financial crises. A key policy tool here are macroprudential capital buffers – such as the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) – which require banks to build up capital in good times so as to increase their resilience when a crisis hits.
Of course we cannot just look at the benefits; we have to consider the costs as well. For example, do higher capital buffers reduce banks’ capacity to lend to (productivity-enhancing) firms in the short run? In fact, studies show that the medium-term resilience gained from macroprudential policies actually comes with limited short-term costs. The post-2021 tightening of macroprudential capital buffers in the euro area has had a minimal impact on overall credit supply by banks, with only a small number of the most capital-constrained banks cutting back on lending.
…. and so are (real estate) booms
Macroprudential policy’s secondary objective can also help boost productivity. Here it should be noted that macroprudential policy does not seek to reduce credit growth in general; its goal is to guard against the excesses that tend to arise during financial booms. These typically consist of very rapid credit growth combined with a rapid rise in asset prices. We know from past experience that this combination is particularly dangerous and, unfortunately, particularly common, when the asset in question is real estate.
But why is this relevant to productivity growth? Credit and real estate booms divert valuable economic resources away from productive firms and towards less productive activities that benefit from rising house prices. In particular, during financial booms credit tends to flow to firms with appreciating tangible assets rather than to more innovative firms that would use it more productively. Indeed, previous ECB research has specifically highlighted euro area banks’ disproportionate real estate exposures, despite this sector’s limited contribution to economic growth.
The literature suggests that the impact of this misallocation during financial booms is sizeable. In the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, rising house prices increasingly diverted banks towards unproductive mortgage lending and away from productive corporate lending: a one standard deviation increase in house prices in a given region in the United States reduced local banks’ corporate lending by 42.3 percent and corporate investment by 20.9 percent. During the average credit boom 70 percent of new credit goes to households and the less productive non-tradeable sector. And this leads to falling productivity.
Misallocation can also occur within sectors: the misallocation of credit among Spanish manufacturing firms – to those that owned appreciating real estate, as opposed to productive firms – accounted for 40% of the decline in productivity in the Spanish economy between 2003 and 2007. Rising real estate prices create a particularly strong disincentive for banks to lend to the innovative, R&D-intensive firms that lead productivity growth. Intangible assets such as intellectual property typically make for less attractive forms of collateral than the appreciating real estate often owned by less productive firms.
And what about macroprudential policy? Recent work by Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz argues that financial regulation that limits the relaxation of lending standards on real estate-collateralised loans during a financial upswing is required to mitigate this misallocation dynamic. Macroprudential policymakers refer to these types of regulations as borrower-based measures (BBMs). BBMs are limits placed on banks’ mortgage lending which restrain their capacity to lend above certain risk metrics. For example, certain multiples of a borrower’s income or certain loan-to-value levels. By directly limiting banks’ capacity to shift towards risky real estate lending, these policies can help counter this misallocation. In some cases they can even limit the excessive house price growth driving the misallocation in the first place. BBMs also make both borrowers and lenders more resilient to financial downturns, thus also making severe (productivity-destroying) financial crises less likely.
Macroprudential policy helps foster a stable environment
Of course, ever-tightening macroprudential policy will not result in ever-growing productivity, and macroprudential policy should continue to be set on the basis of financial stability concerns. However, by increasing the resilience of the system to financial crises and by leaning against the misallocation of resources during financial booms, ambitious macroprudential policy can help create a stable environment. And this is good for productivity growth.
At the same time, further policy action is required to boost European productivity. For now, macroprudential policy primarily targets the banking sector. However, ECB research has highlighted the importance of non-bank financing – such as financial markets and equity investors – for funding risky innovative projects that drive productivity growth. Achieving a more diversified external funding structure in Europe, including through further progress on the capital markets union, could help boost the productivity of euro area firms, which would also benefit financial stability.
Where undue complexity in the (macroprudential) regulatory framework places an undue burden on banks this should also be addressed, but it is in everyone’s interest that we maintain the resilience of the financial system while doing so.